THE ENABLING THE DEATH PENALTY AFTER ENTRY INTO FORCE OF THE EU TREATY OF LISBON
How the EU one day before the signing of the new EU Treaty in Lisbon allowed the death penalty and homicide.Univ. Prof. Dr. iur. Karl Albrecht Schachtschneider wrote the constitutional complaints against the Lisbon Treaty in Germany and Austria's accession to the EU and the EU follow-up contracts in Austria. Prof. Schachtschneider sets out in detail how can be killed or executed under certain conditions. Namely, a riot or insurrection legally knock down, in time of war and imminent threat of war.
On 12 December 2007, p. 2, paragraph 5 of the preamble and paragraph 7 of Article 52 is again included in the Charter of Fundamental Rights. They were already in the failed Constitutional Treaty of 29 October 2004. Intermediate policy against allowing the death penalty and killing is in any case by This text expansion denied.
also the 13th Additional Protocol of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which would exclude the death penalty as a relevant scheme is not considered. The statements on the Charter of Fundamental Rights refers to the state of the Declaration of Nice. This is also the commentary on Borowsy shows in the comments of Jürgen Meyer: (S 107) (They failed ultimately because the desire for congruence between the human rights system of Europe and the fundamental rights of the Union far surpassed addition, defended the English government representatives Rodriguez Bereijo. verhement and insistent that the possibility of exceptions in wartime. BORNE was no getting past. (...)
The statement concerning the Notes to the Charter of Fundamental Rights, under Article 49b (51) TEU ("Supplement") are part of the contracts, which have their liability, is:
" 3. The provisions of Article 2 of the Charter correspond to those
of those articles of the ECHR and its Protocol. You have under Article 52, paragraph 3 of the Charter, the meaning and scope. They must be contained in the ECHR 'negative' definitions are also seen as part of the Charter:
a) Article 2, paragraph 2 of the ECHR:
A killing is not considered a violation of this This article considers when it is caused by a force which is essential to
a) in defense against unlawful violence;
b) a lawful arrest or someone to whom the lawfully detained to prevent the escape;
c) a riot or insurrection legally knock down. "
b) Article 2 of Protocol No. 6 to the ECHR:
"A State may, in its law provide for the death penalty for crimes committed in
time of war or of imminent threat of war; such penalty shall be in cases provided in the law and be applied in accordance with its provisions ... ".
uprisings or riots can also be seen in certain demonstrations
. The lethal use of firearms in such situations after the Treaty of Lisbon, no violation of the right to life. In war, Germany and Austria are also present. The wars of the European Union will be more. But to equip the Union - even by the Treaty of Lisbon. (constitutional challenge to Austria www.kaschachtschneider.de)
The competent representatives of the people had little opportunity to examine this important extension of the Charter. So you can Assume that this does not happen by chance. So also Prof. Schachtschneider to the question in an interview why the text is so complicated: "Just to disguise this fact. The deputies will indeed only the already difficult to understand and presented much too long text of the treaty. " (...) He further argues: "Why would you write the pure, if you do not want it?"
Much has been done to get the death penalty to a humane penal system. Everyone will wonder why they made the death penalty and the killing possible again?
Europe is experiencing the decline of unbridled capitalism. More than three trillion dollars and every day are highly speculative sent virtually around the world, only a fraction of that is money for real investment. Pushed banks in tax havens each other loans in trillions of dollars that have been speculated. It lacks an effective banking on financial control. The artificially constructed (real estate) bubble has burst, in the U.S. already had a number of banks will be supported with trillions of dollars and almost every week the financial institutions go bankrupt. The effects are devastating: We speak of a catastrophe that is all in the shade. Unemployment and poverty are armies are forcing people to despair.
This financial market crisis can be felt also in Europe very much. So there was in the spring of 2009, with European banks lazy or unmarketable securities with a value of 18.1 billion euros. (Udo Kolkotte "Caution civil war")
Due to the free movement of capital that must be implemented by Member States could build the member countries have no protections. Said Prof. Schachtschneider in Current Concerns: "The world trading system is supplemented by the national or regional deregulation of capital movements in the EU Article 56 paragraph 1 EC Treaty," all restrictions on capital movements between Member States and between Member States and third prohibits countries. " A globally agreed tax on speculative capital turnover (Tobin tax) would be in breach of contract, no different than the relevant national or Community Tax (Article 58 EC Treaty). "(Prof. Schachtschneider)
The recorded to support the banks' loans, with their interest rate will be never be repaid and interest rate obligations can. The mine will pay once again the "little man". That is, the peasants, workers and employees, small savers, medium-sized businesses and many people who can repay their loans may no longer share their houses to foreclosure need.
Everything points in the U.S. and in Europe to a total collapse of the currency system towards the end of the dollar and the euro is expected. Above all, the system will only be repaired and compensated, but nothing changed. It is further drawn money, that was long no longer covered by economic performance.
The consequences are predictable: the crowds might increasingly take to the streets and riot. Civil war like situations, and even civil wars do not seem impossible. Shall be made in Germany have secret preparations for counter-insurgency. In meetings of the armed forces already spoken about electro-shock weapons against insurgents and ammunition concerned in case of operations in urban areas particularly for "soft targets" are suitable. (Kolkotte: "Caution civil war")
For this reason alone, the Treaty of Lisbon intolerable and unacceptable. But there are many other reasons for Austria and reject for the other member countries, this development agreement and other contracts to demand.
If a liberal Europe of sovereign nation-state is created, where constitutional courts have the last word in terms of fundamental rights, it's time to turn back and exit from the EU. This is the only way that remains still.
0 comments:
Post a Comment